Indeed, when only the "planners" have access to the results, the data can be easily skewed. They're focused on Mission respondents (vs users from other areas). They regularly compare respondents from Mission to the "overall" respondents:
"When asked to select their FIRST CHOICE of which facilities, services and/or improvements should be prioritized at Stave West safety and security was the top priority vs. the 4th priority in the overall results. "
That aside, some positive take-aways:
- No conflicts with dirt bikers
- 1191 respondents
As for the breaking out the female response, this is likely an attempt to identify the stakeholder's "diversity"
