Dec 2016 Chilliwack Recreational Advisory Group Meeting Minutes

tomcycle

Past President DSBC 2004 -2018
Staff member
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-RB9SNol-6eNzhTbGZpZmQ0VGM

As usual please follow the link above the the December 2016 CRAG meeting minutes. There is a lot of information to digest from this last meeting so PLEEESE take a few moments and read then comment

Of particular interest for DSBC is the Tamihi Kids Loop, although in the minutes they refer to the Section 56s and 57s (permits and permission to do stuff on crown land) as a "Backlog" The real reason, it seems someone at some government office has lost all the applications, something like 20. We at DSBC are not happy, we have put 1000s of dollars and more importantly 1000s of volunteer hours into this project, only to be told 2 years down the road that we have to start again. Its not only DSBC but also Blue Mtn, TCT and the Mtn bikers that have been told this same story.

There is also a bunch of other stuff that should interest just about anyone who ventures off of the paved road

Below is a copy and past of the same minutes


*****************************************************************************************************************************

Chilliwack Recreation Advisory Group Meeting Notes from December 5, 2016
(Chilliwack Resource District Office on Airport Road in Chilliwack)




Attending: Tom Blackbird (Chilliwack Resource District Recreation Officer), Cathy Ross (Chilliwack Resource District Recreation Technician), Ted Bangma (Palm Tree Septic Tank Service), Collin Bangma (Palm Tree Septic Tank Services), Nancy Spratt (Horse Council BC), Karen Black (Right Nuts ATV Club), John Coles (Bear Mountain Trail Society), Ray Keller (Greater Vancouver Motorcycle Club), Neil Hawkings (Dual Sport BC), Ryan Thom (Blue Mtn Motorcycle Club), Doug Storozinski (Chilliwack River Valley Cavers), Meghan Jackson (Fraser Valley Regional District Parks), Karin Smith (Back Country Horsemen BC), Ted Blow (Pacific NorthWest Motorcycle Association), Doug Young (Blue Mountain Motorcycle Club), John McCauley (Yarrow Waterworks District) Rose Schroeder (Back County Horsemen BC), Brian Romak (Chilliwack Snowmobile Club), Mike Overhoff (Dual Sport BC), Ken Hurley (Chilliwack Outdoor Club), Donna Elias (Back Country Horsemen BC), Dwight Harris (Greater Vancourve Motorcycle Club), Peter Friesen (Dual Sport BC)




Abbreviations:




AIA – Archeological Impact Assessment
CFD – Chilliwack Forest Dist
CO - Conservation Officer
DRO - District Recreation Officer
EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment
FRR – Forest Recreation Regulation
FSP – Forest Service Plan
FSR - Forest Service Road
FVRD – Fraser Valley Regional Dist
NRO - Natural Resource Office
NSR - Not Satisfactorily Restocked
RSTBC - Recreation Sites & Trails
Branch of the Ministry of Forests, Lands
& Natural Resource Operations (FLNRO)
RT - Recreation Technician
SEEC – Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission
WHA - Wildlife Habitat Area




4WDABC – 4 Wheel Drive Assoc of BC
ATVBC – Quad Riders Assoc of BC
BCHBC – Back Country Horsemen of BC
BCORMA – BC Off-road Motorcycle Assoc
BCSF – BC Speleological Federation
BCWF – BC Wildlife Federation
BMMC – Blue Mtn Motorcycle Club
BMTS – Bear Mtn Trails Society
CKBC – Canoe Kayak BC
COC – Chilliwack Outdoor Club
CSC – Chilliwack Snowmobile Club
CVRA – Chwk Valley Ratepayers Assoc
DSBC – Dual Sport BC
FMC – Federation of Mtn Clubs
FVMBA – Fraser Valley Mtn Bike Assoc
GVMC – Greater Vancouver Motorcycle Club
HCBC – Horse Council of BC
HPAC – Hangliding and Paragliding Assoc
LMATV – Lower Mainland ATV
NHT – National Hiking Trail
ORC – Outdoor Recreation Council of BC
ORV – Off Road Vehicle
RNATV – Right Nuts ATV Club
SWATT – Southwestern All Terrain Trails Assoc
TBC – Trails BC
TCT – Trans Canada Trail
VKC – Vancouver Kayak Club
VTR – Valley Trail Riders
WCSC – West Coast Soaring Club
YWD – Yarrow Waterworks District








Meeting start: 6:50 p.m. Chaired by Tom Blackbird (RSTBC, CFD, DRO)




Additional Agenda Topics:
12. Teal Jones Forest Stewardship Plan
13. Leon Lebrun’s letter to the Outdoor Recreation Council re: motorized use of the Trans Canada Trail
14. Land Management Plan for the Chilliwack River Valley
15. Chilliwack Search & Rescue




1. Provincial Meeting Update – Tom and Cathy reported on the recent announcement by Christy Clark re: planning for
recreation. Check the “Planning our Future document” on BCParks website http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/bcparks/future/
5-year plan for BCParks and 3-year plan for RSTBC: 1900 more campsites, 800 in BCParks and 1100 RSTBC. The
800 in BCParks will be spread over the province. The 1100 allotted to RSTBC will go to high use areas: 350 in the
Chwk Forest District. The Treasury Board has not announced approval of this as of yet.
Campsite expansion links -
http://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/premier-announces-1900-new-b-c-park-campsites
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-parks-campsites-1.3871546
Other Issues discussed:
- Chwk may get 1 extra staff person to share with Squamish.
- road should be part of the expansion package as for some sites access is non-maintained FSRs.
- signage: working group to develop new wording around the definition of a “commuter vehicle”. Identified, discussed
and analyzed the problems associated with the definition of a commuter motor vehicle. The current RST vehicle
policy is stated as; “Maximum one vehicle per party unless the vehicle is towed or is a commuter vehicle. A
commuter vehicle is any vehicle from the same residence as the first vehicle. All other vehicles require a payment of
an additional camping permit fee. Vehicles must be kept on existing roads, parking areas and campsites.”
Options discussed: At the time when the Forest Recreation Regulations are next amended, remove the reference to “commuter motor vehicle”
and clarify that a party may include an additional non-camping motor vehicle (other than a motorcycle), including a
towed motor vehicle. Consideration may be given to amending the FRR definition of a ‘motor vehicle’ to exclude
camping trailers and remove family from the definition of ‘party’ and align with BC Park’s definition of ‘party’ which is
based on a maximum of 8 persons but no more than 4 adults will add a limit to the number of persons on a campsite
and clarify that only one camping vehicle per party may be parked on a campsite.
- designated ORV Play areas are starting to be developed across the province. Bear Creek Recreation Site & ORV
Play Area - An example of a collaborative approach to managed recreation in a community watershed in the
Okanagan Shuswap district between Recreation Sites and Trails BC and the Okanagan Trail Riders:
http://www.okanagantrailriders.com/news/ Protection of Drinking Water in Community Watersheds Examined https://www.bcfpb.ca/news-resources...drinking-water-community-watersheds-examined/




- NRO Officers spoke on the “Big C, Little E” meaning more Compliance and less Enforcement focusing on issues
around water and fire. Will find out sometime Mar/Apr 2017 how many NROs and RCMP there will be.




2. Chilliwack District News
- Vedder cost updates: wrapped up invoices for costs associated with road improvements ($8500.00 mostly for
machine time repairing trails). Engineering Dept putting in for a Capital project in association with the possible Rec
Site on Vedder.
- Mike Peters is back in the office and will be full time Jan 1, 2017. Tom will ask if he would be a speaker at one of
our future meetings.




3. Mt. Slesse Memorial Trail: new bridge is being used but the road is washing out again and will likely need repairs
next year. There have been some requests to put a toilet in along the trail. RSTBC trying to decide where is best.
Discussion on the abuse of toilets in the valley, the cost of emptying and clean up, repairs, replacement. Budget will
dictate these decisions somewhat.




4. Harrison Fire Lookout – contractor reviewed and suggested that the whole structure is failing. RSTBC is considering rebuilding from ground up. Need at the moment is for a group or individual to source materials and costs.
Roofing materials have already been acquired and RSTBC has the plans. Option to prefab and fly in or fly in raw materials and build on site. Site is not vehicle accessible.
If there is an individual or group interested contact [email protected] 604-702-5762




5. 56 & 57 Applications and Process – Cathy Ross reported on a plan that has been developed to help process the
backlog of applications:
- invested groups will be invited to attend a presentation/meeting regarding the authorization process
- The Recreation Technician will give a PowerPoint presentation on the application process and requirements.
- A representative from each group in attendance will be requested to give a 5-minute briefing as to who they are
and where they are in the process.
- Each attending group will then have the opportunity to schedule a 45-minute meeting with the RT to discuss their
application.
- following this; applications will then be prioritized and processed.
- reminder to keep a copy of anything you are submitting in the process.
- auditors are welcome at the January 22 meeting




Section 57/56 Authorization presentation/meeting - 10:00 am Sunday January 22nd, at the Ministry Offices 46360 Airport Road Chilliwack BC. A presentation will be made by Recreation Technician Cathy Ross. One representative from each organization attending will be expected to provide a brief introduction that is NOT MORE THAN 5 MINUTES in duration and use the following guidelines:
1. State the name of organization, the date established, number of members, social media platforms.
2. Current funding sources, nonprofit status, grants, donations.
3. Provide a brief description and location of the trail, trail network and/or recreation site for which a Section 57/56
is being sought.
4. Provide a timeline and/or outline of where the organization currently ‘thinks’ their application is in the approval process.
Contact Cathy Ross to register your group [email protected]
6. Wet Weather Trail Use Policy – inspections have been done and there is growing concern over recreational and commercial activities in alpine areas and areas where the environment suffers damage due to wet conditions. Discussion points:
- RSTBC currently has no policy for motorized use in alpine areas.
- do any of the CRAG groups have a written policy? If groups had a policy it would help RSTBC defend their position on
trail use as well as liability issues.
- suggestion that groups should have a policy that includes shutting trails or portions thereof that will have a negative
impact on the environment when conditions are wet.
- of particular concern are trails with stream crossings (siltation issues)
- from the beginning of October until the end of March is a critical time for fish.
- educating members on this issue will create responsible users and avoid conflicts.
- decisions on who closes the trail is a partnership. RSTBC would like to trust groups to make responsible decisions
about closing trails.




Wet Weather Trail Riding Policy examples can be found at: http://cairnsmtb.com/wet-weather-trail-riding-policy/ and http://www.millstonetrails.com/trail-closure-policy/

7. FVRD Road Bylaw Update – discussions have wrapped up. No word yet when the new bylaw will take effect.
Tom B will advise when it is announced. Anyone with a badge will play a part in enforcement.
- no shooting 400 meters from center line.
- will be on 400 FSRs in the CFD.




8. Hemlock Update – Work in progress: currently 7 months into a 2 year window to develop a Recreation Management
Plan. A map has been circulated for comments due Dec 15, 2016. Trying to identify which roads will be left as trails.
Tom B will have the map at the next meeting.




9. Blue Mountain – in progress. Still needing to move a gate. There was discussion on logging in the area and
protecting the trails. Concern regarding a lock to the gate that has been changed without notice. Cost for keys is
extraordinary. The need for a new lock is endorsed by Blue Mtn Motorcycle Club but the process was flawed. It is a
safety issue if someone gets hurt behind a locked gate and no one has a key.




10. Skagit and SEEC – Cathy will be doing a presentation to SEEC about recreation interests in the Skagit River Valley.
If anyone has anything of interest to share please contact Cathy [email protected]




11. Stave West Update – will have Gene McInnes come give an update in early 2017.




12. Teal Jones FSP – recreation is recognized in the plan but trails are not layered onto it so difficult to comment on
impacts. Colors of different layers are negligible making it difficult to use. Concern why BC Timber Sales is not
sharing the trails info the CRAG groups submitted?




13. Trails BC letter to ORC – re: motorized use on the TCT, particularly the KVR (Kettle Valley Railway).




14. Land Management Plan for the Chilliwack River Valley – who does it? Suggestion: not the City, so contact the
Planning Dept. of FVRD.




15. Chilliwack Search and Rescue – on Nov 18 a member had his equipment stolen from his truck. Thanks to Dual
Sport BC who have raised $1500.00 to help him replace it.




16. BCWF Conservation App – for reporting infractions straight from your phone: http://bcwf.net/index.php/bcwf-app

17. Next Meeting – January 23, 2017
18. Adjourned – at 9:00 p.m.
 

offworlder

Moderator
Certainly alot of disconcerting news :mad: here. Hard to keep forging ahead with all the govt. blundering, yet forge ahead we must.
Thanks for keeping us informed.
 

tomcycle

Past President DSBC 2004 -2018
Staff member
Does anybody even read this stuff???

Does anybody even read this stuff???

Does anybody even read this stuff???


Some very important and for me, disturbing items are in these meeting minutes




Yes I am part of "don't trust your government" School. Now to be honest I did not attend this meeting but have talked to more than a few people that were in attendance. When I read these minute I was given the feeling there was a message being contrived, rather than true minutes, but what really got me going is Item 5
5. 56 & 57 Applications and Process – Cathy Ross reported on a plan that has been developed to help process the
backlog of applications:
- invested groups will be invited to attend a presentation/meeting regarding the authorization process
- The Recreation Technician will give a PowerPoint presentation on the application process and requirements.
- A representative from each group in attendance will be requested to give a 5-minute briefing as to who they are
and where they are in the process.
- Each attending group will then have the opportunity to schedule a 45-minute meeting with the RT to discuss their
application.
- following this; applications will then be prioritized and processed.
- reminder to keep a copy of anything you are submitting in the process.
- auditors are welcome at the January 22 meeting



As many of you know the Right Nuts and DSBC had proposed and applied for a Kids Loop at Tamihi. This process is now over two years into the process. I was concerned that our application was going to be reviewed again, and if so why?


It was said at the meeting by RSTBC rep that Front Counter (government) has lost something like 20 section 56 and 57s, including the kids loop project. To say the least I am outraged. Particularly at the fact we are being told we have to re enter the process, which I am also to understand it is being changed. We are told by RSTBC that we did not follow the proper process, which I will call BS, we did everything that was asked of us and more.


The 1000s of volunteer hours put into this process are for naught, if the technician decides that or project is not complete or viable.


The Tamihi Kids Loop and many other projects have lost their "place in line" after two years we are not even in line and if we get approved (again) we will be at the end of the line. More outrage!!!!!



But wait there is more


Section 5 and 6 of these minutes were pre prepared by the RSTBC technician and handed to the person taking notes. Now I dont have much of a problem with this, but without know this it leaves the rest of us believing this is what really happened at this meeting. ( presently there is a request to have these minutes reflect this).




Section 57/56 Authorization presentation/meeting - 10:00 am Sunday January 22nd, at the Ministry Offices 46360 Airport Road Chilliwack BC. A presentation will be made by Recreation Technician Cathy Ross. One representative from each organization attending will be expected to provide a brief introduction that is NOT MORE THAN 5 MINUTES in duration and use the following guidelines:
1. State the name of organization, the date established, number of members, social media platforms.
2. Current funding sources, nonprofit status, grants, donations.
3. Provide a brief description and location of the trail, trail network and/or recreation site for which a Section 57/56
is being sought.
4. Provide a timeline and/or outline of where the organization currently ‘thinks’ their application is in the approval process.



So what you read here is that we can only have ONE representative at the meeting that this technician will be making decisions on our project. The Tamihi Kids Loop had many volunteers, all with specific jobs and specific knowledge of the project. It would be ridiculous to think we could send one person (a volunteer) that could represent the entire project.


RSTBC is asking for a lot more information than what was or is currently required for an application ie, number of members, social media platforms, current funding sources, grants and donations. Why does the government need this information? As far as I can tell this is not a requirement for a section 56 or 57


If you want to know more about Section 56 and 57 just google " bc forestry section 56 57" best of luck trying to figure it out.


And even more


It was also made clear at this meeting that everyone should stop doing any type of trail work without the proper authorization (section 57) what we are doing is illegal and must cease.


PLEASE read section 6 Wet Weather Trail Use Policy.




Perhaps I am off my rocker but I see something here and what I see is not good for the ORV recreationalist that uses the Chilliwack Forest District as their playground


DISCLAIMER
These are my opinions and comments not that of any organisation or group


Tom


_________________
 

offworlder

Moderator
Tom, while not surprised, I'm guessing we're all equally disgusted (as you). This further illustrates the need for a strong, consistently present voice that ACTUALLY represents our interests, not just says it does. If it wasnt for the tireless work of folks like yerself - we'd all be more in the dark than some of us already are.

Shall we (all DSBC members that give a hoot) identify the appropriate govt. bodies, remind them of both our disgust with the state of things, of the upcoming election, and start a letter writing/calling campaign making this issue visible, and demanding answers ?

Folks: just because we have plenty of places to ride NOW, doesnt mean we always will !
 

tomcycle

Past President DSBC 2004 -2018
Staff member
Thanks Mark, at least got one follower. Presently we are trying to get more detailed verified information, remember I am a bit of a conspiracy theorist.

Presently the people that have applications in question, are in support of this new process (I don't know why?), I suspect they don't want to rock the boat and loose their application all together. I think the boat is already rocking and we are about to be tossed over.

I will update as new information is available

T
 

tomcycle

Past President DSBC 2004 -2018
Staff member
I will keep this thread going as I suspect there might be something much bigger at play here.

Something that was said by the RSTBC Technician but not recorded in the minutes. I suspect this was missed as there seemed to be a couple of bombs dropped at once. DSBC has formally requested that this get included in the minutes.
All clubs doing trail work must cease immediately

No one knows where or why this became an issue, If the Tech was working on her own or following instructions further up the ladder? We can only hope that this is not the message that RSTBC is trying to send out to the Clubs and volunteers who keep all the motorised and non motorised trails open.

It has been a long accepted practice that simple trail maintenance has not required approval. However the interpretation simple maintenance has been left to the Recreation Officer.

I have also requested that BCORMA enter into this, as their experience with these kind of issues and connections with the other clubs (GVMC, Blue Mtn, GVMC Vedder), will be superior to anything we could do on our own.

Lets hope I am reading this all wrong and we can continue our enjoyment of the outdoors as we have in the past

Tom
 

offworlder

Moderator
WTF ? I sure hope thats not the case either. After doing next to nothing ('cept bungling), they think they can just throw their weight around, and dictate what can and can not happen on the trails that we built (their constituents, who they are supposed to be serving !) ?!? :mad:
Who's calling the shots here anyway ? Govt. or private interests ?
 

black99S

Member
Aww crap. It can get ugly fast. Social media allows one voice to incite an angry crowd.
Someone inquiries to Gov't asking who authorized 'work', maybe quoting applicable statutes or guidelines. Sh!t flows downhill. Discretionary actions of authorizing person are questioned. Black / white rule is applied and all good intentioned people suffer while the person in power get's a"handle" on the situation and figures how to appease / answer the questioning / complaining party and get back in control - knowing the dialog will be Facebooked and might either cost them their job or embarrass the party in power which leads to more scrutiny.

I wish the "don't touch the environment" crowd would focus on illegal garbage dumping and untreated sewage pumped to oceans, rather than issues like mountain trail maintenance.
 

LordEndo

Member
Staff member
I will keep this thread going as I suspect there might be something much bigger at play here.

Something that was said by the RSTBC Technician but not recorded in the minutes. I suspect this was missed as there seemed to be a couple of bombs dropped at once. DSBC has formally requested that this get included in the minutes.


No one knows where or why this became an issue, If the Tech was working on her own or following instructions further up the ladder? We can only hope that this is not the message that RSTBC is trying to send out to the Clubs and volunteers who keep all the motorised and non motorised trails open.

It has been a long accepted practice that simple trail maintenance has not required approval. However the interpretation simple maintenance has been left to the Recreation Officer.

I have also requested that BCORMA enter into this, as their experience with these kind of issues and connections with the other clubs (GVMC, Blue Mtn, GVMC Vedder), will be superior to anything we could do on our own.

Lets hope I am reading this all wrong and we can continue our enjoyment of the outdoors as we have in the past

Tom


Tom can you please help direct me to the acts and regulations. I think it's time I have a read through them. I'm guessing here that there is a federal code that enacts a provincial act that enacts regulations or something like that.
 

sylvain

"2018 Forest Fairies"
Tom can you please help direct me to the acts and regulations. I think it's time I have a read through them. I'm guessing here that there is a federal code that enacts a provincial act that enacts regulations or something like that.

Yessssssssss

We get the guy to serve Gov the treatment Gov serve us!
That is going to be interesting!

We need T-Shirt to help support the cause?
 

tomcycle

Past President DSBC 2004 -2018
Staff member
Tom can you please help direct me to the acts and regulations. I think it's time I have a read through them. I'm guessing here that there is a federal code that enacts a provincial act that enacts regulations or something like that.

Most
of what we do fall under the FOREST AND RANGE PRACTICES ACT http://www.bclaws.ca/civix/document/id/consol21/consol21/00_02069_01
You will find all three sections 56 57 58, that government is always using against us

================================================== ===============

Then of course you can get some more information here at Front Counter BC,
Make sure you watch the video then open the pdf below, be sure to read it all, then comment


http://www.frontcounterbc.ca/pdf/S57ApplicationInfoGuide.pdf

Dont know what Front Counter is?????? watch the vid

Authorization for constructing, maintaining, rehabilitating trails or recreation facilities on Crown land underthe Forest and Range Practices Act.
Section 57 of the Forest and Range Practices Act (FRPA) prohibits construction, maintenance or
rehabilitation of a trail or recreation facility unless authorized in writing by the Minister or under another
enactment. Section 57 of FRPA applies to all provincial Crown land outside of parks. If you are in doubt as to
the status of an area and whether or not section 57 applies, please contact the nearest District Recreation
Officer (DRO).
Some activities DO NOT require authorization under section 57:
Section 57 does not apply to basic public access or basic recreational use of Crown land. The following activities
do not require authorization:
 Basic access or travel through the forest or across the land, by individuals or groups, whether on a onetime
basis or repetitive use of the same route.
For example: hiking on Crown land and the normal ground disturbance associated with this activity.
 Route finding or route marking using ribbons, cairns or other directional indicators.
For example: marking one‟s way with cairns in an alpine area or with ribbons in a forest.
Note: the standard practice of nailing route markers to trees is an allowable practice and is not considered
tree spiking under Section 55 of the Act (Tree Spiking Prohibited).
 Minor, piecemeal or incidental clearing of brush or downed trees either on or off established trails.
For example: bushwhacking, or clearing branches or deadfall that has fallen across an existing path or
trail.
 Emergency repairs to a trail or recreation facility that is necessary to prevent imminent damage to the
environment, the trail or the facility.
For example: repairing a water bar on a section of trail where flooding is occurring and immediate repair is
needed.
Application Information and Guidelines
for
Proposal Form for Trails and Recreation Facilities
The purpose of this information package is to assist proponents of trail and recreation facility applications in meeting the
requirements for authorization according to Section 57, of the Forest and Range Practices Act (FRPA) and Part 3 of the Forest
Recreation Regulation.
Ministry of Forests, Lands and
Natural Resource Operations
2
Application Information and Guidelines_Revised-Feb-2012.docx Page 2 of 10
 Emergency construction or maintenance of a trail when this is the only reasonable way of minimizing risk
to personal safety.
For example: placing a log over a stream that is necessary to cross to get out of the woods by dark.
 Basic recreational use of a localized area, by individuals or groups.
For example: camping on Crown land and the normal ground disturbance associated with this activity.
 Construction of small, rustic structures of a temporary nature.
For example: construction of rock fire rings, latrines, etc.
If you are uncertain whether or not your intended activity requires consent, please contact the nearest District
Recreation Officer

================================================== ============
 
Top