East Kootenay FSR closures

Jaeger

Member
So with a topic ongoing about budget decisions causing road closures in the West Kootenays, I figured I had better ask about road closures in the East Kootenays in the Cranbrook & Invermere Forest Districts. Called MoF in Cranbrook to ask about it. None of the engineers were in, but I did talk to one of the techs. He said as far as he knew, the only closures he was aware of was decommissioning some of the roads already overgrown with alders. I can think of a few off the top of my head that meet that description, and most are now in a state that they're only useable by the most hard core alder-bashers anyways.

The guy I talked to couldn't give me a definitive answer on a road closure strategy related to budgets, but will be putting me in contact with the person responsible in the next couple of days. More definitive information then.

One road to be concerned about is the Ram Creek FSR. That would be the road that runs from the Premier Lake road, over the pass past the Ram Creek Hot Springs (which haven't been hot for decades), and then down into the White Swan into the Lussier/Coyote Creek road systems, coming out at Alces Lake. It isn't an intended closure, but one which may be made out of budgetry necessity.

As I have the info so far, the beavers got busy, dammed up the creek, whereupon the creek ran right down the middle of the road for some distance, pretty much scouring it out. To shorten a long story, 4x4's and quads came to play in the mud, started messing up fish habitat, and the MoF bermed the road to protect the fish habitat for the time being. The quad guys have managed to defeat the berms somehow or other and are now back to riding in and playing in the creek. Which of course is a major concern for the fisheries biologists.

The end result is that right now the Cranbrook MoF is deciding whether to get MOE to take out the beavers, pay for road repairs, and then try to keep quads from going back into the creek and other habitat. Or to keep their money in their jeans and simply let the through road go permanently.

Anyone who enjoys using the Ram Creek Road for hunting, riding, whatever should take this as a hint to lobby for having this designated as a high recreational value road and having it properly repaired. To the best of my knowledge no decision has been made as of yet.

Now would be a good time to do that. Contact MoF in Cranbrook and Bill Bennett - in a nice way.
 

sector

Moderator
imported post

imported post

Jaeger, do you have contact info for MOE? I'm not familiar with the particular road, but any road that goes through anywhere is worth keeping!
 

CANADIAN BACON

New member
imported post

imported post

sector wrote:
Jaeger, do you have contact info for MOE? I'm not familiar with the particular road, but any road that goes through anywhere is worth keeping!
I agree.
If a road is already over grown why remove it.
 

Jaeger

Member
imported post

imported post

sector wrote:
Jaeger, do you have contact info for MOE? I'm not familiar with the particular road, but any road that goes through anywhere is worth keeping!
Do you want MOE or MoF? MoF looks after the roads, although the MOE is supposedly involved in this decision because of the ongoing beaver problem.

MoF in Cranbrook is 426-1700. The engineer looking after that road is away on fires right now. Getting an email addy and sending in a written submission with a CC to Bill Bennett on the value of that road would probably be better. To the best of my knowledge, they haven't even began the process of deciding what to do with this road yet.

You should familiarize yourself with the road if you're going to write about it however - there are other routes through, although none quite like this route.

CANADIAN BACON wrote:
I agree.
If a road is already over grown why remove it.
Why? Because even if it is 100% alders and impassible by anything other than a moose, as long as it remains a "road", the MoF have to meet all their legal obligations relating to that road. Which takes money out of their budget to spend on other roads that are still viable for motorized traffic.

On another note, if every road in were kept open forever, it wouldn't take long before there was nothing left unaccessible by quad or whatever. In my mind, it is just as important that there are areas only accessible by foot by those willing to put in the effort as there are roads available to those who enjoy using those roads and who have no intention of ever going any distance away from some form of motorized transportation. I love dual sporting. But I also like having valleys and watersheds I can go hunting or backpacking in without hearing a bike or a quad or watching them go back and forth. Some people value both activities, and I don't think they're mutually exclusive.

Furthermore, road density has a significant impact on many wildlife species, with elk, sheep and goats in particular of importance to me, and the welfare of wildlife takes precedence over my desire to rip around on my bike in my mind.
 
Top