Farp
Active member
imported post
imported post
I've gone through Death Valley a couple of times and I think for that kind of terrain the KLX250 would have the edge over the CRF230L. But the KLX weighs 298 pounds wet as compared to 267 for the CRF and the KLX has a 35 inch seat height compared to 31.9 inches for the CRF. When you pitch sideways after hitting a root or boulder that 35 inch seat height makes it more difficult to plant a foot. My experience with these bikes is that the KLX is better on the street and FSRs but the Honda is a smaller, lighter bike with a ton of low end grunt and is better on gnarly trails. It just depends where you want to ride.
John
imported post
I've gone through Death Valley a couple of times and I think for that kind of terrain the KLX250 would have the edge over the CRF230L. But the KLX weighs 298 pounds wet as compared to 267 for the CRF and the KLX has a 35 inch seat height compared to 31.9 inches for the CRF. When you pitch sideways after hitting a root or boulder that 35 inch seat height makes it more difficult to plant a foot. My experience with these bikes is that the KLX is better on the street and FSRs but the Honda is a smaller, lighter bike with a ton of low end grunt and is better on gnarly trails. It just depends where you want to ride.
John