imported post
imported post
I've never used one, but many yanks swear by em on tt. This issue was raised some time ago in this forum, both pros and cons. A good scott's may be cleaned well...as often as you want! However, this is a pain in the a**--unless you have a military skill in quickly cleaning metal parts. Futher, there's no scientific evidence that it's better, just what scott's sez.
I really like their steering damper so I am inclined to believe them, but I would like to see a head to head test against OEM filters in MCN or even in DSBC. My position on it is that the reusable concept as advertised by scott's makes sense but there is no proof...as such I will stick to paper for now and await more long term reports from tt before I make a switch. Again, they are huge popular on the tt drz 400 forum, but we disagree with the yanks on many things...most of them consider the 400s a joke and waste of time, as well as the stock jetting and supension, but it seems to work pretty damn good for us and our conditions. The yanks seem to think the bike needs a complete overhaul to function effectively--that the S model has almost no credibility off road. Well, I'm just an average rider but it has sure taken an licking and it does whatever I need it to do, and the elder statesmen around here never cease to impress me on it...so I've learned to take what I read on the drz 400 section of with a grain of salt...
I'm always willing to try somethingnew butI have done more reasearch and found the evidence anecdotal and thus "paper thin".I'll stick to OEM pending objective tests...
barfducks